CHEMICAL SENSORS RESEARCH GROUP
About Us
Home
Leaflet
Members
How to reach us?
Ph. D. studies
Education
Tutorial on ISE
Tutorial on SSE
Tutorial on ISFET
Tutorial on OPTO
Tutorial on mTAS
Tutorial on EN/ET
Lectures for students
Cluster for students
Books on sensors
Glossary
Research
From analyte to signal
Selected papers
Patents
Current projects
Collaborators
Equipment
Chemical compounds
Software developed
European activity
Center of excellence ENVIMAN
Polish thematic network AN-NET
Valid HTML 4.0!
Valid CSS!

Fiber optic chemical sensors

Prepared by Artur Dybko

INTRODUCTION

Fiber optic chemical sensors (FOCS) can offer several advantages over traditional sensors. The light weight and small size of fiber optic sensors are strongly complemented by their strong immunity to electromagnetic interference. Since the fiber sensors are made of glass they are environmentally rugged and can tolerate high temperatures, vibration, shock and they can operate in extremely harsh conditions. There are many excellent reviews on FOCS published in recent years [1,2,3].

There are many types of fiber optic chemical sensors which can measure concentration of neutral or charged species. The principle of operation of FOCS will be explained on the example of pH sensor because it is one of the most important sensor in analytical chemistry.


Fig.1 Schematic experimental set-up of FOCS.

The sensor consists of three main parts: light source, optrode and detector. The main part of the sensor, so-called optrode, contains an appropriate indicator which changes its optical properties in dependence on the analyte. In most cases, it is necessary to use an indicator because the analyte does not give or exhibit changes of optical properties. The indicator can change, for example, absorbance or fluorescence intensity. The light source is matched to the so-called analytical wavelength of the indicator then the best sensitivity of the sensor can be obtained. Detector, usually photodiode or PMT, converts optical signal into electric one which is next electronically processed.

OPERATING PRINCIPLE


Fig.2 shows operating principle of a pH sensor based on absorbance indicator.

The pulse of light from a light emitting diode (LED) is coupled into optical fiber and transmitted to a pH sensitive membrane. The membrane changes its absorbance (colour) in dependence on pH of the sample. If the absorbance is quite low the light is only slightly absorbed which is depicted by almost the same pulse of the light returning to the photodiode. When the pH of the sample is changed the absorbance of the membrane increases so the returning pulse of the light is smaller (see Fig.3).


Fig.3 Sensor based on absorbance indicator at solution of different pH.

Light is usually modulated to a square wave because the measurements are not influenced by an ambient light and in order to increase the signal to noise ratio.

Sensors can be also based on the use of fluorescence indicator immobilized in the membrane.


Fig.4 Sensor based on fluorescence indicator.

In this case, the light excites molecules of the indicator which emits light at different wavelength. The analyte can, for example, influence on the intensity of the fluorescence radiation which is depicted by different amplitude of the returning pulses (see Fig.4).


Fig.5 Sensor based on fluorescence indicator at solution of different pH.

SIGNAL CONVERSION IN THE SENSOR

Typical conversion process of the signal in the FOCS is presented in Fig.6.


Fig.6 Conversion of the signal in fiber optic chemical sensor.

Chemical signal caused by the analyte is converted into optical one in chemooptical interface. The chemooptical interface consists of membrane with an appropriate indicator. The indicator changes its optical properties (e.g. absorbance, fluorescence) in dependence on analyte. Such an optical signal with information about sample under test is converted into electric signal in an optoelectronic interface. The main part of this interface is the photodetector connected to an electronic circuit. The electric signal can be acquired and processed by PC-lab card. In the case of a pH sensor signal is processed according to procedure shown in Fig.7.


Fig.7 Signal processing in a fiber optic pH sensor.

The signal from the sensor is acquired by the card, then it is processed according to the calibration procedure and displayed on the monitor. The acquired data can be saved on the disk.

EXAMPLE OF FIBER OPTIC pH SENSOR

The fiber optic system can be controlled by a software developed in Lab Windows environment. The main idea of the software is to design user friendly and interactive application which can be applied in many sensor configurations. The user can set up its own application based on pre-design modules. There are many modules possible to use in each phase of signal processing. Some typical ones designed for signal acquisition are presented in fig.8.


Fig.8 Examples of modules for signal aquisition.

The user has to chose a module which is the most suitable for its application and place it on the screen. Similar modules are designed for each part of signal processing. It is possible to use as many modules as the user needs. Every module has its own name and in this way it can be recognized by any module. The modules shown in fig.8 allow to set the gain of the acquisition card, sampling rate, channel of the card etc. The output signal from the card is transmitted to further processing.

Fig.9 shows application software designed for a pH sensor with the use of different modules.


Fig.9 Fiber optic pH sensor controlled by LabWindows application.

The signal from the sensor is amplified by proper settings of control module of Lab-PC+ card. Next module is used for signal processing where calibration formula is applied. The calibration data can be saved and retrieved for each sensor. Last module gives graph with dependence of the signal versus time. When appropriate settings of the card and calibration procedure were done it is possible to switch off any display which is not important during the measurements without any influence on work of the system. The modules left will be rescaled automatically. For example, only pH value can be displayed on the monitor.

Main features of the application:

  • software is user friendly and is based on typical Windows commands
  • designed process can be saved
  • display is rescaled automatically
  • user can chose modules for configuration
  • user can design his own project

Example of sensor configuration

The most basic version of the experimental set-up is shown in Fig.10.


Fig.10 Configuration of fiber optic pH sensors (GEN-square wave generator, LED-light emitting diode, PD-photodiode, AMP-transimpedance amplifier, AF-active filter).

Modulated light from a light emitting diode (LED) is transmitted to the optrode by one arm of the fiber optic bundle. The light matched to the maximum of the molar absorbance of neutral red (560 nm) is reflected in dependence on pH variations and then it is transmitted to a photodiode by the second arm of the bundle. The photodiode is connected with a transimpedance amplifier and active filter. The electrical signal obtained is acquired and processed by a pc-lab card with 12-bit A/D converter. The optrode was built on the common end of the bundle by the use of removable Teflon tube, which holds an optomembrane.

REFERENCES

  1. W.R.Seitz Chemical sensors with fiber optics, Crit. Rev. in Anal. Chem., 19, 1988, 15
  2. D.L.Wise Biosensors with fiber optics, Humana Press, New York, 1991
  3. O.S.Wolfbeis Fiber optic chemical sensors and biosensors, Boca Raton, 1991
  4. K. Seiler and W. Simon, Principles and mechanisms of ion-selective optodes, Sensors and Actuators B, 6 (1992) 295-298.
  5. A. Dybko, W. Wróblewski, J. Maciejewski, Z. Brzózka, R. Romaniuk, Novel matrix for fibre optic chemical sensors made of particle track polymer, Proc. SPIE, 2508 (1995) 351-357.
  6. A. Dybko, W. Wróblewski, J. Maciejewski, Z. Brzózka, R. Romaniuk, J. Kie^(3)kiewicz, Polymer track membranes as a trap support for reagent in fibre optic sensors, J. of Apll. Polym. Sci., 59 (1996) 719-723.
  7. A.Dybko, W.Wróblewski, J.Maciejewski, R.Romaniuk, Z.Brzózka Efficient reagent immobilization procedure for ion-sensitive optomembranes, Sensors and Actuators B - in press
  8. E. Bishop, Indicators, Pergamon, Oxford, 1972.

OPTICAL FIBER TECHNOLOGY

Prepared by Dorota Stadnik

All optical fibers consist of a core having the refractive index higher than of surrounding cladding. They can be made of just glass or polymer, or combination of both. They also have protective polymer layers called buffer or jacket.


Fig.1 Cross-section of optical fiber

There are two methods to manufacture optical glass fiber: either directly drawing the fiber from molten glasses, which are placed in two concentric crucibles (Double Crucible method) or from a glass rod called preform. Nowadays most optical fibers are made from the preform. There are three steps in this method:

  1. Fabrication of the preform
  2. Drawing the fiber from the preform
  3. Coating and jacketing process

The preforms are fabricated using chemical vapor deposition methods [1]:

  1. Modified Chemical Vapor Deposition (MCVD)
  2. Plasma Modified Chemical Vapor Deposition (PMCVD)
  3. Plasma Chemical Vapor Deposition (PCVD)
  4. Outside Vapor Deposition (OVD)
  5. Vapor-phase Axial Deposition (AVD)

All these methods are based on thermal chemical vapor reaction that forms oxides, which are deposited as layers of glass particles called soot, outer rotating rod or inside glass tube. The same chemical reactions occur in both methods. Starting materials are solutions of SiCl4, GeCl4, POCl3, and gaseous BCl3. These liquids are evaporated within oxygen stream and form silica and other oxides. Chemical reactions proceed as follows:

SiCl4 + O2 → SiO2 + 2 Cl2
GeCl4 + O2 → GeO2 + 2 Cl2
4 POCl3 + 3 O2 → 2 P2O5 + 6 Cl2
4 BCl3 + 3 O2 → 2 B2O3 + 6 Cl2

Germanium dioxide and phosphorus pentoxide increase the refractive index of glass, whilst boron oxide - decreases. These oxides are known as dopands. Changing composition of the mixture during the process influences refractive index profile of the preform.

Modified Chemical Vapor Deposition (MCVD)

This method was developed by Bell Laboratories [2]. The gaseous mixture of reactants described above is fed at the end of a rotating silica tube. This tube is heated by a traversing oxygen-hydrogen burner (Fig.2). As a result of chemical reactions glass particles, called soot, are formed. These particles are deposited on internal wall of the tube. The soot is then vitrified by the traversing burner to provide a thin glass layer. The process is repeated many times as the cladding layers and core layers are formed. When the deposition is finished, the temperature of the burner is increased to collapse the tube into a solid preform. The entire process is highly automated and all process parameters are precisely controlled.


Fig. 2 Deposition by MCVD process

Plasma Modified Chemical Vapor Deposition (PMCVD)

A modification of MCVD method is a process known as PMCVD. In addition to the normal MCVD technique the radio-frequency coil around the tube generates an internal high temperature plasma.


Fig.3 Deposition by PMCVD process

Plasma Chemical Vapor Deposition (PCVD)

The PCVD method is similar to PMCVD. The radio-frequency coil is replaced by a microwave cavity resonator (Fig. 4). In this method reactions lead directly to of glass layer without forming the soot.


Fig. 4 Deposition by PCVD process

Outside Vapor Deposition (OVD)

This process is also called the "soot process". It was exclusively used by Corning since the 1970s, and the patent of such a technology has expired since July 2000.
Halogens and O2 react in a hot flame to form hot glass soot, which is deposited layer by layer on an aluminium oxide or graphite mandrel. The central mandrel is removed after deposition. In the last step, called sintering, a hollow porous preform is dehydrated and collapsed in controlled atmosphere, (e. g. helium) to form desired preform.


Fig. 5 Preform fabrication by OVD process

Vapor-phase Axial Deposition VAD

In VAD method (in contrary to above methods) the perform can be fabricated continuously. Starting chemicals are carried from the bottom into oxygen-hydrogen burner flame to produce glass soot which is deposited on the end of a rotating silica rot. A porous preform is then grown in the axial direction. The starting rod is pulled upward and rotated in the same way as that used to grow single crystals. Finally the preform is dehydrated and vitrified in ring heaters (Fig. 6). This process is preferred for the mass production.


Fig. 6 Preform fabrication by VAD process

Fiber Drawing

Optical fibers are obtained by drawing from the preform at high temperature. The drawing process must be integrated with the coating process to avoid contamination of fiber surface. These processes are shown schematically in Fig.7.


Fig. 7 Schematic of fiber drawing and draw tower solution

The tip of the perform is heated in a furnace to a molten state. Formed molten gob falls down under the force of gravity while shrinking in diameter into a proper diameter strand. It is controlled continuously during the drawing process. Diameter drift cannot exceed 0.1%. The strand is threaded through a series coating applicators immediately after drawing. Liquid prepolymer coatings are cured by thermal or ultraviolet apparatus. Dual coating, soft inner and hard outer, is needed to avoid microbending and protect against impact and crushing forces in either manufacturing process or installation. silicone coating and acrylate, Tefzel (ETFE), Teflon (PFA), nylon buffers are applied during the fiber drawing, while additional materials such as Hyrtel and PVC can be extruded after the draw process. The fiber with coatings is pulled down and wound on a winding drum. The drawing process must take place in air conditioned room, because air pollution influences fiber attenuation.

References

  1. Fibre optics: theory and applications, Serge Ungar, Wiley, New York, 1990.
  2. Handbook of fiber optics: theory and applications, Chai Yeh, Academic Press, San Diego, 1990.
PDF iconPDF presentation

Warsaw University of Technology
Department of Analytical Chemistry
Noakowskiego 3
00-664 Warsaw, Poland


mail: brzozka@ch.pw.edu.pl
phone: +48 22 234 5427
fax: +48 22 234 5631
www: csrg.ch.pw.edu.pl